Souhlasim se Salome - forma je temer stejne dulezita, jako obsah. Kdyz ctu
text plny pravopisnych hrubek, vyrazne mne to zatezuje. Tvrzeni, ze pokud
vynechana carka nezmeni obsah, neni treba se tim trapit, se mi nelibi. U
zjevnych prikladu neni problem, ale obcas se setkavam s tim, ze si nejsem
uplne jisty, co chce autor rici. Zejmena to plati u textu v cizim jazyce, ale
v cestine taky.
Nevadi mi nespisovne psani. Nevadi mi zamerne psani zkomolenin, ktere jsou
kratsi nez original (quli, jaxi, xicht ap.) - pokud umi autor odlisit, na
jake urovni si muze dovolit danou formu pouzit.
Hrubky s i/y, s/z a spatne umistenymi carkami mi vadi velmi - a pristup
Covexe a Semika povazuju za ignorantsky a barbarsky. Kdyby se takhle chovali
vsichni, nas jazyk by davno zdegeneroval do foneticke anarchie :).
Mozna to znate:
A Plan for the Improvement of English Spelling
by Mark Twain
For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replased
either by "k" or "s," and likewise "x" would no longer be part of the
alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained would be the "ch"
formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w" spelling,
so that "which" and "one" would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might
well abolish "y" replasing it with "i" and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j"
anomali wonse and for all.
Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5
doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing
vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it
wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c," "y" and
"x"--bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez--tu riplais "ch,"
"sh," and "th" rispektivli.
Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl,
kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld.
|\/\/\/|
[any man that hates | |
[small dogs and children | |
[can't be all bad | (o)(o) -coyot
C _) ba'buss
[http://www.jokes.cz] | ,___|
|
